A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours about the development of a wall at a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments posting about René Collier and the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, find to create their household residence. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven citizens. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore regions are subject to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably in a sensitive coastal natural environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waist-high h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they had been meant to Get visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 men entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the website turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a location afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were lined in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage the wall, as created, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up documents, maps, and conditions connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental defense and adherence to setting up legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their lengthy-standing link to the area and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only attempting to produce a family members property in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out determined by Qualified suggestions and approved strategies. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like entering The ocean during a storm, don't change the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for any circumstance that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Specialist backgrounds can find on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much solution.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing circumstances. However the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to live together with each other lengthy once the authorized costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and property rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains an area of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to The most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.