A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst possible neighbours in excess of the construction of the wall in a coastal web-site within a north Dublin suburb, a case which has attracted national focus pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family house at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of planning breaches, environmental problems, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Periods article about René Collier along with the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has progressed into a highly publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design operates at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a business director respectively, seek out to create their spouse and children household. The case has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of proven inhabitants. In accordance with the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining built by their possible neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted below setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing permission by building a wall over and above the boundaries of their website, bringing about an encroachment with a Specific Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, as a result spots are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have Long lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside a sensitive coastal natural environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, that is partly created, is in the correct posture. Their legal workforce has characterised the motion being an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding to be able to protect their view, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal scheduling disputes, in which views of the sea are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic attempts because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the site, In keeping with sworn evidence referenced from the Irish Instances. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image that has since turn out to be emblematic from the depth in the dispute. These steps were not simply symbolic; they were being meant to Acquire visual evidence in the wall’s position relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from your sea Irish Times documented, describing how The 2 men entered the h2o in the course of extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the internet site became one of the most placing descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely famous that this kind of actions were cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception the wall extended into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected in detail because of the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to know the history and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important minute during the lawful timeline.
Within the Main in the dispute is a disagreement about boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain that the wall, as created, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has long been described as meticulous in his assessment of planning documents, maps, and conditions hooked up to the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving a private see, insisting rather that it's about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have got explained their prolonged-standing link to the area and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple simply just seeking to make a family household in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches over a Exclusive Place of Conservation and say that each one operates have already been carried out dependant on Qualified tips and authorized plans. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with getting into the sea during a storm, tend not to change the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for the condition that many observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among non-public land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions posting about René Collier observed that the businessman had Beforehand been involved with regional advocacy on preparing and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty distinct Experienced backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, became synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location within the René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments and René Collier waded by means of midsection-superior drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the site Irish Times are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting equally the physical fact in the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme tactic.
As the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom must decide whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and whether or not any encroachment right into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing circumstances. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who must Stay alongside each other very long after the authorized expenses are actually paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of design functions at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the case lengthen outside of that handle. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the importance of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. It also underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when basic challenges which include environmental protection and property rights are perceived to get at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of organic splendor and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful queries. Whether it is going to eventually be altered, eliminated, or concluded as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible continue on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Just about the most carefully viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin lately.